Introduction to the Basics of the Relationship between Law and Ethics in Fuzzy Logic Measurement: Interaction or Conflict

Author

p

Abstract

                                                                                                       
The influence of the legislator on ethics and sharia to achieve the principle of proportionality in the laws is undeniable. Sometimes moral precepts and sometimes legal precepts create social order. Some believe that morality and law are in conflict with each other, and some see the two as complementary and balanced. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect and relationship between ethics and law based on fuzzy thinking. In fact, based on fuzzy theory, we are looking for a new approach to the relationship between law and ethics in the writing of laws and legal relations. Therefore, based on logic and fuzzy thinking, curiosity and accuracy seek to know the variables of this issue and understand why the relationship between law and ethics is concerned. Therefore, the context of the relationship between law and ethics with a fuzzy thinking can be found widely in common practice. The conclusion is that one of the researcher's mental theories is to use the basic principles and principles of fuzzy ethics in law and legislation in criminal, civil, commercial and other issues for more justice.

Keywords

References

  1.  

    1. The Holy Quran, Translated by Ghomsheai.
    2. Nahj al-Balaghah, Translated by Mohammad Dashti.
      1. Ahmadi, Amir and Amiri, shirzad (2014), “Study of Particular Conditions and Qualities of Enforcement Officers’ Self-efense in Regulations of Arms use Act in the Light of Fuzzy Logic”, Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(16) Special 2014, p. 534-540.
      2. Ahmadi, A., Amiri, S., Naseri, S. & Rezaei, S. (2014), “The legal–criminological analysis of Islamic penal law article 146passed in 2013 in the light of fuzzy logic”, Academia Arena 2014, V. 6, N. 5 (Cumulated No. 59), May 25, 2014 6(5), p.1-6. http://www.sciencepub.net/academia;
      3. Alamzadeh Nouri, Mohammad (2017), “The skeptical nature of moral concepts and its role in the interpretation of moral propositions”, mind, 18 (69), p. 158-125.
      4. Altman, Andrew (1986), Introduction to the Philosophy of Law, translated by Behrouz Jandaghi, Tehran: Imam Khomeini Research and Educational Institute, p. 567.
      5. Anwari, Saeed (2004), “Fuzzy Thinking and Its Application in Philosophy”, Allameh Special Quarterly, No. 3 & 4, p.177-199.
      6. Bishop, Robert J. (2006), Shadows of Reality: How New Fuzzy Philosophy Changes Our Worldview, translated by Ali Sotoudeh Chobari, Tehran: Roshangaran Publishing and Women's Studies.
      7. Bozorgmaqam, Mohsen (1994), “Ethics and the Relativity of Morality”, Kayhan Andisheh, p. 57-58.
      8. Casco, Bart (2013), Fuzzy Thinking, Translated by Ali Ghaffari, Adel Maghsoudpour, Alireza Pourmomtaz and Jamshid Qasimi, Fifth Edition, Tehran: Publisher of Khajeh Nasir al-Din Tusi University of Technology, p. 337.
      9. Civil Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
      10. Del Vecchio, Giorgio (2007), Philosophy of Law, translated by Javad Vahedi, Tehran: Mizan.
      11. Firuzabadi, M. (2004), al-Qamoos al-Muhit, Researched by School of Heritage Research at the Institute of Letters, edited by Mohammad Naeem al-Arqusousi, eighth edition, Beirut: Foundation for Printing, Publishing and Distribution.
      12. Haghani, Mahmoud (1997), “Application of Fuzzy Zone in Assessing Academic Achievement”, Quarterly Journal of Education, V. 13, N. 2, Serial Number 50, p.53-59.
      13. Horini Firouzabadi Shirazi, M. (N.d), al-Qamoos al-Muhit wa al-Qaboos al-Wasit fi al-loqat, Beirut: Dar al-Alam leljami.
      14. Hoseinzādeh Yazdi, M. (2008), “Epistemic Fundamentals of Fuzzy Logic: A Critical Study”, Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 9(4), p.121-146. doi: 10.22091/pfk.2008.252
        1. Ibn Manzoor al-Afraqi al-Masri (1984), Arabic language, publisher of the literature of Al-Hawza, printed: Dar al-Ihyaa al-Torath al-Arabi.
        2. Islami, Esfandiar (2011), Fuzzy region and its applications, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.
        3. Jamshidi, Mohammad Hossein & Moradi, Ruhollah (2016), “An Introduction to the Application of Fuzzy Zone in Explaining Political Affairs”, Journal of Methodology of Humanities, Vol. 22, No. 87, p. 119-144.
        4. Javadi, Mohsen (1995), « Immortality of Ethical Principles and Credit Theory », Knowledge, Vol. 15.
        5. Kartalopus, s. v. (2003), Fuzzy Zone and Neural Networks (Concepts and Applications), Translated by Jourabian, M. & Hooshmand, R., Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.
        6. Katozian, Nasser (2005), Introduction to Iranian Law and Legal System, 43th Edition, Tehran: Publishing Company.
        7. Katozian, Nasser (2007), “Ethics and Law”, Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, Second Year, No. 1 & 2, p. 85-88.
        8. Katozian, Nasser (2014), Philosophy of Law, Seventh Edition, Tehran: Publishing Company.
        9. Lafollette, H. (2007), The Practice of Ethics. Malden, ME: Blackwell Publishing.
        10. McCartney, S. and Parent, R. (2015), Ethics in Law Enforcement, Publisher: BCcampus
        11. Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taghi (2015), Philosophy Education, 18th edition, Tehran: Islamic Propaganda Organization, International Publishing Company.
        12. Minhaj, Mohammad Baqer and Nesaji, Mehdi (2000), “Fundamentals of Fuzzy Reasoning”, Journal of Management Knowledge, 13th year, p. 51, p. 24-34.
        13. Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2015), “The Influence of a Business Ethics Course on Ethical Judgments of Malaysian Accountants”, Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(2), p.147-161.
        14. Motahari, Morteza. (1995), Islam and the requirements, fifth edition, Tehran: Sadra.
        15. Motahari, Morteza (2007), Philosophy of Ethics, 26th edition, Tehran: Sadra.
        16. Mousavi, G. & Sadeghian, R. (2016), “A Study of Fuzzy Zone and its Application in Complex Problems”, Journal of Nations Research, V. 2, N. 15, p. 77-89.
        17. Pollock, J. M. (2010), Ethical dilemmas and decisions in criminal justice, United States: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
          1. Poyman, Louis (1998), A Critique of Moral Relativity, translated by Mahmoud Fathali, Journal of Criticism and Opinion, Fourth Year, First and Second Issues.
          2. Qorashi Banai, Ali Akbar (1990), Quran Dictionary, sixth edition, Tehran: Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiyya.
          3. Qayyumi Muqri, A. (1994), al-Misbah al-Munir, Researcher: Yusuf Sheikh Muhammad, Second Edition, Publisher: al-Maktabah al-Asri.
          4. Qayyumi, Sedigheh (2002), Fuzzy Region and its Philosophical Foundations, Master Thesis in Philosophy, Supervisor: Abdolreza Nabavi, Tarbiat Modares University.
          5. Ragheb Isfahani, A. (1990), al-Mufradat Fi Gharib al-Quran, Researcher: Safwan Adnan al-Dawoodi, Damascus, Beirut: Dar al-Qalam, Dar al-Shamiya.
          6. Ranjbar, R., Vakilzadeh, R. & A'ali Malek Tash, S. (2010), “Considering Fuzzy Approach to Islamic Juridical System”, Religious Researches, 6(3), p.25-50.
          7. Rawls, J. (1999), a Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
          8. Saroukhani, B., Sadeghipour, S. (2014), “Fuzzy Logic: A Means to Construct and Measure Concepts in Social Science”, Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 8(3), p.47-64.
          9. Shamloo, B., Kazemi Jouybari, M. (2015), “Postmodernism and Rethinking the Concept of Crime”, Journal of Criminal Law Research, 4(12), p. 43-68. doi: 10.22054/jclr.2015.1781
          10. Smith, GW. (1998), Limits of Law, In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Routledge Inc. New York.
          11. Tabatabai, Sayyid Muhammad Hussein (1990), al-Mizan Fi Tafsir al-Quran, Qom: Ismailian Press Institute.
          12. Tarihi Najafi, Fakhreddin (1990), Majma al-Bahrain, research by Sayyid Ahmad Hosseini, second edition, Qom: Publications of the Islamic Culture Publishing House.
          13. Vakili, Hadi (2007), Argument and Mysticism, First Year, No. 1, p.151-179.
          14. Zadeh L. A. (1965), “A Fuzzy sets”, information control, Vo. l8 & 19, p. 338-353.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 09 October 2020
  • Revise Date: 06 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 28 January 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics