A Qualitative Approach to the Clergies' Understanding of Moral Conflicts in Commitment to their Professional Duties and Daily Livelihood

Author

Assistant Professor of the Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture

Abstract

 
Livelihood and income-generating activities, in general, are important bio-human issues. Undoubtedly, the experience of gaining income in relation to different classes, guilds, and social groups is very different from their place in society. Clergies are one of the groups whose living conditions have long been considered by the public in comparison with other social groups; because on the one hand, the clergy is known as a preacher of religion and is expected to be satisfied with what he has and to live like the majority of society, even below them. On the other hand, living conditions and the economic situation prevailing in Iranian society, have involved clergies and their families in various difficult economic issues. However, these two tendencies have led to moral conflicts between the living conditions of clergies and their religious-organizational duties towards society. With this in mind, the purpose of this study is to answer the question of what is the moral conflict between their professional duties and daily livelihood according to clergies' statements. The approach applied in this research is qualitative, and the thematic analysis method has been used to analyze the data. In this regard, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 employed and non-employed married clergies, who were selected by purposive sampling. Thematic analysis showed that “work conscience and manly moral responsibility’, “personal motivation to become a clergy and economic motivation for progress” and “personal dignity and professional honor” are the cases that are in conflict.

Keywords


  1. The Holy Quran.
  2. Ahmadpour, Mehdi (2018), “Typology and analysis of moral harms of religious propaganda”, Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 29, p. 31-55.
  3. Amedi, Abdul Wahed bin Mohammad (2007), Fehrest Ghorar al-Hekam, translated by Mohammad Ali Ansari Qomi, Qom: Islamic Library.
  4. Atrak, Hossein (2010), “Ethical Conscientiousness”, Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, Vol. 1 and 2, p. 27-35.
  5. Atrak, Hossein (2012), “Ethical Duties in the Viewpoint of David Ross”, Mirror of Knowledge, Vol. 17, p. 123-150.
  6. Fassihi Ramandi, Mehdi (2020), “Honesty in the field of propagating religion; A Study of Several Ethical Challenges”, Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 34, p. 37-56.
  7. Fattahi, Seyed Ali (2015), Ethics of missionaries, Tehran: Asr Javan.
  8. Firoozmehr, Mohammad Mehdi; Shirzad Kamangar, Hassan (2018), “Ethical issues of missionaries with emphasis on established missionaries”, Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 29, p. 11-29.
  9. Frankenna, William K. (1997), Philosophy of Ethics, translated by Hadi Sadeghi, Qom: Taha Cultural Institute.
  10. Hare, R. M. (1978), “Moral Conflicts, The Tanner Lecture on Human Values”, Available at: http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/tanner, p.170-193.
  11. Holmes, L., Robert (2006), Fundamentals of Philosophy of Ethics, translated by Massoud Olia, Tehran: Phoenix Publishing.
  12. Ismaili, Ismail (1997), “Reform of the seminary in the view of Martyr Sadr”, Quarterly of the seminary, vol. 79-80, p. 32-66.
  13. Jafarian, Majid, Bashir, Hassan, Miri, Seyed Javad (2015), “Cultural Reading of Fundamental Dialogue in Iran - A Qualitative Study”, Journal of Intercultural Communication, No. 35, p. 9-35.
  14. Jafarian, Rasool (2021), One Hundred Years of the Seminary of Qom, Qom: historian.
  15. Palmer L, Karen (1995), “Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, p. 119–132.
  16. Khorasani, Lotfollah (2018), “The role of moral dimensions in improving propaganda”, Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 29, p. 57-74.
  17. Mohammadpour, Ahmad; Rezaei, Mehdi, Partovi, Latif; ‌Sadeghi, Rasoul (2009), “Semantic Reconstruction of Family Changes in a Background Method”, Family Research, Fifth Year, No. 19.
  18. Movahedi, Mohammad Javad; Golzar Esfahani, Mojgan (2011), “Critique and Evaluation of Conscientiousness”, Journal of Medical Ethics and History, Vol. 4, p. 28-36.
  19. Naeli, Ali Mohammad (1995), Motivation in Organizations, Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.
  20. Rahimi Kaloor, Hossein; Golzard, Amin, Ghaffari Majlaj, Hoda (2019), “Analysis of the relationship between work conscience and social responsibility: The mediating role”, Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, Vol. 1, p. 11-107.
  21. Ross, W. D. (2002), The Right and the Good, New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
  22. Shahedi, Samereh; Zamiri, Mohammad Reza (2017), “A Critical Study of Moral Conflicts from the Perspective of David Ross Based on Verses and Narrations”, Journal of Quranic Studies, Vol. 31, ‌p. 57-88.
  23. Shahroui, Davood (2000), The seminary and the clergy from the perspective of the martyr Ayatollah Motahhari, Tehran: Parsayan Publishing.
  24. Shariati Mazinani, Sara; Soleimani, Mehdi (2013), “Sociological study of bureaucratization of Qom seminary with Weber approach (processes, challenges and obstacles)”, Social Studies of Iran, Vol. 1, p. 81-112.
  25. Shokri, Mohammad; ‌Faghihi, Seyed Ahmad (1397), “Moral problems of propagating religion and ways out of it”, Quarterly Journal of Ethics, vol. 29, p. 99-120.
  26. Soleimanieh, Mehdi (2014), Student Life: A Preliminary Study in the Sociological Typology of Biology, Tehran: Contemporary View.
  27. Zakizadeh Renani, Alireza (1397), “Ethical Principles and Barriers to Student Propaganda”, Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 29, p. 75-98.
  28. shia-news.com/000Ux4
  29. https://b2n.ir/m87835
  30. https://www.yjc.news/00XcLd                                              
Volume 17, Issue 44 - Serial Number 66
Special issue of clerical activism ethics, commissioned by the ethics depatment of the center of family ethics and lifestyle
March 2022
Pages 45-76
  • Receive Date: 22 January 2022
  • Revise Date: 04 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 08 February 2022