Ethical Codes of Clergy Activism in Social Networks

Authors

1 .Researcher and graduate of the fourth level of Qom Seminary

2 Researcher and member of applied ethics group of Qur'an and Hadith Research Institute

Abstract

 
With the emergence of information and communication and the expansion of the Internet and social networks, the activism of Shia clergy has entered the technological scene under the name of virtual activism. Virtual activism takes place in the context of virtual space and social networks between the actor and the audience. The active networks of clerics with their audience, which is carried out with the goal of delivering the message of religion in the context of social networks, is called the Congress of Social Doors Clergy. Clergy activism in social networks is not an unconditional practice, but requires ethical principles and regulations.
This article seeks to identify and examine the most important examples of the implementation of ethical principles as a code of ethics in the activism of the clergy in social networks. is considered. Research information has been collected by induction and observation of actors and interpreted with the help of documentary sources.

Keywords

References

  1. Holy Quran.
  2. Nahj al-Balagha.

3.       Abdullahi Nejad, Alireza and Sondos Mohammadi Nosudi (2021). “Social activism in cyber space (a case study: Iraqi Kurdish activists)”. Quarterly of the Iranian Association for Cultural and Communication Studies, year 17. No. 63: 1-27.

  1. Ahmadpour, Mahdi (2021). Ethics of preaching religion, ethical charter of missionaries in the life of Ahl al-Bayt (AS). Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture.

5.       Amedi, Abd al-Wahed ibn Muhammad (1410 AH). Ghorar al-Hekam va Dorar al-Kalem. second edition. Qom: Dar al-Katb al-Islami.

  1. Amoli Larijani, Sadegh (1991). Religious Knowledge. Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Center.
  2. Basirian Jahromi, Hossein and others (2015). “social media and crisis management; The role of smart phones in social activism”. Media. 27(1). serial 102: 57-83.
  3. Din Mohammadi, Mohammad & Rostami, Fatima (2021). “examination and explanation of the knowledge and skill prerequisites in promoting the ethics of clerical activism”. Ethic Promotional Scientific Quarterly. 11(44). 66 consecutive: 171-145.

9.       Esmaili, Esmail (1995). “Ethics of Servant Clergymen”, Hozha magazine. Vol. 68 & 69: 203-222.

  1. Hosseini Mutlaq, Seyyed Morteza & Imani Moghadam, Mahdi (2021). “the comparison of the opinions of Allameh Tabatabayi and Allameh Misbah Yazdi about the origin of moral obligation and value”. Ethical Research Quarterly. 12(2): 103-114.
  2. Hosseini Qala Bahman, Seyyed Ali Akbar (2016). “analysis of the moral code of love in the Catholic religion”. scientific-research quarterly of ethics. 1(3): 92-110.
  3. Hosseini Qala Bahman, Seyyed Ali Akbar (2021). “the principles of ethics of social activism of clerics in the teachings of Shia and Catholic religion”. Ethics Quarterly. 11(44). 66 consecutive: 11-43.
  4. Kazemi, Seyyed Mohammad (2021). typology of activist students in Instagram social network. Qom: Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture.
  5. Koleini, Yaqoub (1407 AH). al-Kafi. research by Ali Akbar Ghafari. 4th edition. Tehran: Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiyyah.
  6. Masoudi, Abdulhadi (2013). Social relations from the perspective of the Qur'an. Qom: Dar al-Hadith.
  7. Mirahmadi, Seyed Ali and others (2016). “examining the role of social networks in soft war”. Semnan Management Knowledge Quarterly. 6(19): 189-217.
  8. Misbah Yazdi, M. T. (2014). Moral Philosophy. Qom: Publications of Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute.
  9. Naqdipour, Subhan (2019). The fundamentals and ethical principles of the site space from a religious point of view and the examination of governance policies based on it. Dissertation level 4 of Seminary. Qom.
  10. Pishghadam, Gholamreza, Iravani, Javad & Kharghani, Hassan (2016). “analysis of the provisions of "must be public" and its consequences in Allameh Tabatabai's theory of validity”. Kalam Research Journal. 4(7), series 7: 49-72.
  11. Shahid Sani (2001). Moniyat al-Marid. third edition. Qom: Islamic Propaganda Office of Qom Seminary.
  12. Tabatabaei, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein (2008). translation and explanation of Nahayat al-Hikmat. translated by Ali Shirvani. second edition. Qom: Bostan Kitab.
  13. Tabatabaei, Seyyed Muhammad Hossein (1417 AH). Tafsir al-Mizan. 5th edition. Qom: Publications Office of the Qom District Madrasin Community.

23.    Tabatabayi, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein (1995). Tafsir al-Mizan. translated by Mohammad Bagher Mousavi Hamedani. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.Yaqoubi, Abdulreza (2013). “Semantics of the word Clergy”. Journal of Cultural and Social Knowledge. 3(4): 5-20

Quarterly Scientific Journal of Applied Ethics Studies
Volume 18, Issue 46 - Serial Number 68
September 2022
Pages 39-64

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 14 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 19 August 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics