Identifying Moral and Spiritual Problems of Activism and Clergy in Virtual Space

References

1. Abdullahian, H. & Tavakoli, A. (2003). “Constructing a virtual world with commanding implications”. Culture-Communication Studies, 16(8): p. 69-98 .
2. Abdullahian, H. & Zahedi, M. J. & Sheikh Ansari, M. (2013). “Evaluation of structure, interactions, anonymity and self-representation in four virtual social networks”. Media and Culture, 3(2): p. 103-127.
3. Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi ,A. & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). “Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process”. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1): p. 42-55. Doi: 10.1177/1744987117741667.
4. Doherty, T. (2017). The Presentation of Self in 'Online' Life: A Content Analysis of Instagram Profiles. Master thesis (Supervisor: F. Nelson). Sociology, Calgary University.
5. Dreyfus, H. L. (2004). About the Internet. Translated by Ali Farsi Nejad. Tehran: Saghi.
6. Gane, N. & Beer, D. (2008). New media. Oxford: Berg.
7. Ghasemi, H. (2013). The second cyber life doctrine. Master's thesis. Faculty of Management and Accounting. Allameh Tabatabai University.
8. Goffman, E. (2016). Self-expression in everyday life. Translated by Masoud Kianpour, 3rd edition. Tehran: Markaz publishing house.
9. Hassani, H. & Kalantari, A. H. (2017). “Phenomenological analysis of the lived experience of users of the visual social network Instagram in Iran”. Quarterly of Culture and Communication Studies, 18(40): p. 33-62. Doi: 10.22083/jccs.2018.97513.2250
10. Hogan, B. (2010). “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online”. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 30(6): p. 377-386. Doi:10.1177/0270467610385893
11. Hojsgaard, M. T. & Warburg, M. (2005). Religion and cyberspace. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
12. Marsh, D. & Stoker, J. (2010). Theory and Methods in Political Science. Translated by Amir Mohammad Haji Yousefi. 3rd edition. Tehran: Research Center for Strategic Studies.
13. Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge.
14. Ravadrad, A. & Gishnizjani, G. (2017). “Typology of media body representation patterns of Iranian users on Instagram”. New Media Studies, 3(10): p. 310-265. 265-310. Doi: 10.22054/cs.2017.22288.237
15. Robinson, L. (2007). “The cyberself: the self-ing project goes online, symbolic interaction in the digital age”. New Media & Society, 9(1): p. 93-110. Doi: 10.1177/1461444807072216
16. Sadeghipour, M. S. (2012). Žižek’s poetry; Four articles and their description. Tehran: Qoqnoos publishing house.
17. Seyed Emami, K. (2015). Interview methods for political research. Tehran: Imam Sadiq University.
18. Smith, G. (2006). Erving Goffman. London: Routledge.
19. Clair, Michael. (2016). Object Relation and Self-Psychology; an introduction. Translated by Alireza Tahmasab & Hamed Ali Aghaei. 4th edition. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
20. Torbati, S. (2005). “"Self" performance in virtual reality”. Communication Research Quarterly, 12(44): p. 138-151.
21. Zabihzadeh, A., Taghdisi, M., Mazaheri, M. A. & Shokri, O. (2016). “Comparing the way people face ethical situations in the virtual world and the real world”. Culture Strategy Quarterly, 10(39): p. 122-97.