Qualitative-Quantitative Analysis of Communication Damages of Missionary Women and the extent of its extent, with the approach of the ethics of preaching religion

Authors

1 Official researcher of Masoumieh Islamic Research Center. Al-Zahra S. community teacher

2 Doctoral student of statistics, University of Tehran

10.22081/jare.2025.70247.1967

Abstract

Missionary women have a significant impact on reforming the lifestyle and beliefs of Muslim families, especially girls and women in the Islamic society. One of the criticisms raised in the real and virtual space in this regard is related to the communication ethics of missionary women during preaching activities, which are sometimes attributed to some behavioral harms. Considering the importance of the moral position of missionary women, it is necessary to examine these criticisms and what are the harms raised and measure their frequency. The current research has dealt with this issue with the combined qualitative-quantitative method; in the first phase, in the qualitative phase, the harms have been identified, and in the second phase, in the quantitative phase, the extent of its spread in the field of missionary women's propaganda has been evaluated. The findings indicate that although there are damages in the communication ethics of women based on the evidence based on the experience of the preachers, there are harms in relation to the listeners, colleagues and men, but its extent is not confirmed by statistical tests.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References 
Abedi Jafari, H., Taslimi, M. S., Faghihi, A. & Sheikhzadeh, M. (2011). “Theme Analysis and Theme Networks; A Simple and Efficient Method for Explaining Patterns in Qualitative Data”. Strategic Management Thought, 5(10): 151-198.
Amiri, A. N., Hemmati, M. & Mobini, M. (2010). “Professional Ethics, a Necessity for Organizations”. Ethical Knowledge, 1(4): 137-159.
Faramarz Qaramalki, A. (2004). Professional Ethics. Qom: Majnoon.
Flick, U. (2008). Introduction to Qualitative Research. translated by Hadi Jalili. Tehran: Nei Publishing.
Gall, M., Borg, W. & Gall, J. (2003). Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods in Educational Sciences and Psychology. translated by Ahmad Reza Nasr and others. Tehran: SAMT.
Khanmohammadi, E. (2013). Pathology of the Religious Propaganda Model and the Presentation of the Desired Model. Master's thesis. Baqir al-Ulum University of Qom, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences.
Lawrence, N. (2009). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. translated by Danaeifard, H. and Kazemi, S. H.. Tehran: Mehrian Publishing House.
Mohammadpour, A. (2009). Qualitative Research Method Versus Method. Tehran: Sociologists.
Neshat, N. (n.d.). “Professional Ethics”. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Tehran: National Library.
Niazi, M. (2011). “Integrated Research Methods, the Third Methodological Movement in Social Sciences”. Iranian Social Studies, 5(2): 158-174.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2013). Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Steps for Generating Grounded Theory. Tehran: Nei Publishing.
 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 November 2024
  • Revise Date: 16 March 2025
  • Accept Date: 07 March 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics